
Lord of The Rings: The Two Towers
Directed By: Peter Jackson
PG, 2 hrs. 59 mins.
Two towers, the second movie in the Lord of The Rings trilogy, was a wonderful counterpart to the book. I
was worried that it wouldn't be well done, but Peter Jackson is pure genius. The actors are very well chosen
and the effects were not lacking. Although, in some parts the graphics did make me laugh a little. There were
parts they added that were not in the book; which, I didn't understand, because there were enough parts in the book that they
had to cut some elements from the book out of the movie. No need for the adding. Also, Arwen has been made
a huge character, which only makes me want to cry, because she's only mentioned a couple of times at the end of the third
book. I think its because Liv Tyler is such a huge actress, but I was very disappointed by her constant apperances on
the screen for no reason. The elves were extremely wonderful in this movie, as always. They make your heart race.
Lots of elves mean there is quite a bit of elven language in this movie that they don't translate, which is quiet frustrating
if you notice that sort of thing. The action scenes are amazing, although it seems that Legolas gets all the really
good moves. The Ents are wonderfully done and give you a real fealing for the green side of Middle Earth,
which is what everyone is really fighting for in the trillogy anyway. All together, this was a wonderful movie which
everyone should make it a point to see.
I rated it: a high nine
Reviewed By: Mary S.
From before December 2002

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron
Directed by: Kelly Asbury, Lorna Cook
PG, 1 Hr. 44 Mins
A horse is born wild and free. Some seem just a little more fond of that freedom than others. This horse
is bound and determined, not only to stay free, but to protect his herd from the often dangerous world around us.
This was a surprising movie. The horses don't talk, except for the main character's scattered naration, but that
does nothing to hinder the movie in plot or flow. Indeed, the artists drew everything right into their faces better
than words could do! And, if a silent movie scares you, the humans in the movie speak normally. I would
recomend this movie to anyone of any age as a good, wholesome, enjoyable movie.
I rated it: 8.5
Reviewed By: -Mel. S.

The Rookie
Directed by: John Lee Hancock
G, 2hrs 9min
For a G rated live action movie, it was pretty good. The kids even enjoyed it! Absolutely no
swearing, no violence, no sex and no nudity...what was Hollywood thinking? But, I loved it.
It's the story of real life science teacher/baseball coach (Dennis Quaid) who
challenged his team to win Districts and he would give the major leagues a try...again. He had been drafted as a young
man but had a career ending injury to his shoulder and vowed never to play again. In coaching, he decided to try to
throw again...just to see. After stinging the hand of his high school catcher, he pitched past a sign on a road that's
set up to tell drivers how fast they're going. He is downhearted when the sign says 76 mph. As he walks away,
the sign blinks and 96 mph shows up!! Needless to say, his teams wins Districts and he tries out for the major leagues.
Great
story...I'd give it an 8.
Reviewed By: Lisa W.

Spider-Man
Directed by: Sam Raimi
PG-13, 2 hrs. 01 min.
Oh the Cheese of it all! This long awaited movie tells the stroy of Marvel's famous Spider-Man. Told
from the web-makers point of view, this movie was the cheesiest movie I've seen all spring. It starts before he
was a hero--when Peter Parker was, basically, high school's geek of the week. Bit by a spider on a class trip, he morphes
into his towns best weapon in the ever present fight against criminal activity. In the process
he learns when to help those in need (always), wins the love of his life (Kirsten Dunst), and learns fighting evil always
comes at a painful price.
This movie was incredibly cheesy. It had even the die-hard fans with me rolling
their eyes at the massive amounts of cheddar floating across the screen. Half the movie was spent introducing the story
to the two people out there who don't know it, and the other half was spent mooning over it. I would suggest saving
this one for a rental; for that would be well worth it.
I would also suggest going to see a sequel. Sound odd? Ponder this:
now that the basics are out of the way the sequel will be able to expand upon the action. It will have a plot for it's
own sake, and will therefore make a great movie in it's own right with characters we all enjoy.
I Rated It: 7
Reviewed By: -Mel. S.

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring Directed
by: Peter Jackson PG-13, 2 hrs. 58 min
Ah yes, the movie of the year based upon the book of the century. The full story itself created a fantasy genre that
pits earthy, natural good against a supernatural evil. This first installment is nearly a three-hour plunge into Tolkein's
incredibly detailed world, introducing you to most of the major players while getting to walk with them on the first leg of
their journey. The tale is of a god-like enemy named Sauron making himself a ring to rule the world and clumsily losing it
in battle. Lost for thousands of years, the ring is discovered by a hobbit (Bilbo Baggins) and is passed on to his nephew
Frodo. Gandalf the wizard, knowing the ring's origin, presses young Frodo to take it away to safety.
Yes, it is a
movie based on a great book, and therefore drew all sorts of criticisms from Tolkein purists. There are parts missing, especially
in the first third of the movie, but the film does something many often miss. It creates a feeling. You feel that Middle-Earth
is real and that the odd creatures could have existed. I've read the book at least four times, read the entire trilogy just
before the movie came out and I still enjoyed the story as if just being introduced. The visuals are astounding and the story
is strong enough to please most critics. My only advice is this--if you know the story already, see the movie twice. The first
time you'll waste orienting yourself in the story, but the second will be pure enjoyment!
I give it a: 10 Reviewed
By: Tyler O.

Stuart Little 2
Directed By: Rob Minkoff
Rated PG, 1 hr. 15 min.
Everyone's favorite "Little" is
back on the big screen. Once again, we're brought to the "Little" household in New York City, where an adopted mouse named
Stuart (Fox) is trying to assert his independence from his overprotective mother (Davis). In the process, he befriends a helpless
canary named Margalo (Griffith) who unwittingly puts him up against a cunning and mischievous falcon (Woods).
I
think this movie was very well done. It just picks up where the last movie left off. The first movie (which was
based on E. B. Whites classic novel) showed Stuart adjusting to life in his new family, and this movie shows him well adjusted
and tackling the problems that every child deals with: making friends, declaring his independence, and sneaking
out from Moms overprotective wing. Also, in the original Stuart Little, his parents seemed oblivious to the fact
that Stuart was a mouse. In this movie, Mr. and Mrs. Little are very aware of this fact, as we see in the beginning
where Mrs. Little is very apprehensive about Stuart playing soccer because of his diminished stature.
However,
this movie did have its shortcomings. It implied that Stuart and Margalo are growing past friendship. I could
go on a MAJOR tirade here. First of all, he's a mouse and she's a bird. I'm not sure a romance like that is even
possible. Secondly, can't a guy just be friends with a girl without it becoming a romantic thing? Why can't they
just be friends??
Even with this little fluke, I believe this movie was well worth the money. It's a good, wholesome
movie with little or no bad language, no sex, and lots of non-perverted humor.
I Rated It: 6.5
Reviewed By: Dave H.

Ice Age
Directed by: Chris Wedge
PG, 1 hr. 25 mins.
This was a really cute story. A mammoth, tiger, and a sloth have found a human baby.
The sloth pleads that they should take it back to it's humans, and the mammoth finally agrees. The tiger will lead them,
but he is a treacherous fellow, and liable to lead them into more danger than good.
This is a new and different twist of a story, and cudos for that! The graphics are good,
and the acting is enjoyable. (Ray Ramano has come a long way.) This is a story for children under 12 AND
their parents. There is nothing TOO unexpected. Just enjoy it for what it is, a cute little story about group
of loners who learn to become a team.
Rated it: 9 for kids, 8 for adults
Reviewed By: -Mel. S.

Kate & Leopold Directed by: James Mangold PG-13, 2
hrs. 11 min.
Here it is! Chick flick of the year! Kate's ex-boyfriend is doing some experimentation with time. He's flabergasted when
he falls into 1867; all his theories were correct! However, a bit of his research follows him home. Leopold, the gentleman
of royal blood from the past, falls in love with Kate. How will they bridge the distance between them?
This simple
story is told with a lot of heart. The likeableness of all the characters, the authenticity with which the parts are played,
and a small twist in the ending really bring this one together. If your looking for something uncomplicated and honest, this
is it. It would make a great date movie, or a later rental.
I rated it: 8.5 Reviewed By: -Mel. S.

Jimmy Neutron, Boy Genius Directed by: John A. Davis
G, 1 hr. 27 min.
Jimmy is an overzealous, confident kid just trying to fit in and...oh yeah...save the planet. This movie was a blast
for the 10 and under crowd in the theatre with me. The computer graphics were innovative as were his use of carnival rides
as spaceships.
As an adult, however, the predictability level of this film was a little over the top. I did manage
to laugh out loud 2 or 3 times, so it wasn't a total loss. All in all, very amusing indeed.
I rated it: 9 (for kids),
5 (for adults) Reviewed By: Lisa W.
The Majestic Directed by: Frank Darabont PG, 2 hrs. 39
min.
Is this a wonderful life or what? This Jim Carrey movie feels like something out of an old Capra film. Carrey plays a
man without a memory. The small town he comes to love calls him Luke. He doesn't know his past is about to catch up
with him.
Looking clueless and lost through most of the movie, this must have been a hard role for Carrey--an actor
known for his overacting abilities. He does an excellent job here though, I cried.
I rated it: 9 (if your feeling
cheesy), 7 (if not) Reviewed By: -Mel. S.
Ocean's 11 Directed by: Steven Soderbergh PG-13, 1 hr.
57 mins
Ocean's a quick paced story of an ex-conn out for a little revenge. Nothing vicious, just total and complete anilation.
The greedy guy took his girl while he was in jail, now Ocean will take all greedy guy's money and hopefully the girl as well.
It's a simple plot with some lovely twists. At the edge of my seat the whole time, I walked away wondering what was
part of the conn and what was what happens along the way. There's even a few questions about whether this is really the end!
This is not a total guy flick (I'm a girl and I liked it), but it does have some nice explosions. I would call it a fun flick
for now and an must-see rental for later.
I Rated it: 9 Reviewed By: -Mel. S.
From Before December 2001

Monsters, Inc. Directed by: David Silverman, Pete Docter G,
1 hr. 46 min.
Two monsters let a little girl into their world. Now two monsters must get her out! Quick, before anyone finds out, she
must be saved!
This was an adorable movie. With the espected Disney all-star cast and the Pixar company's grafics
it was hard to beat. It was a story for adults, as well as kids. And, that little girl! Who could resist such cuteness? It's
another excellent film from the Toy Story people.
My rating: 8 Reviewed by: -Mel. S.

Hearts in Atlantis Directed by: Scott Hicks
PG-13, 1hr. 41mins.
Anthony Hopkins plays a stranger who comes to lodge above the boy's house. It all starts when Anthony Hopkins' character
asks the boy to look out for anything strange in the neigborhood and read his paper for him. What follows is a series of events
that change the boy's life forever.
Based on a book by Stephen King, this was a thoughtful, impressive movie about
a little boy who grows up. There is a confidence in this movie that comes through throughout. The only bone I had to pick
with it was the ending. I thought the boy should have retained some of the abilities the older man shared with him, thus creating
a feeling of continuation, a feeling that the special qualities of the man won't be lost when he is gone.
Rated: 8
Reviewed By: -Mel. S.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Directed By: Chris Columbus PG,
2 hrs. 40 mins.
Harry Potter. No one still breathing can't NOT be aware of the controversy. Well, the movie is out, right in time for
the various holidays at the end of the year. Funny, the movie came at the right time, after everything that happened this
year. It's a happy movie. It's, in part, what we needed as a nation.
So, what's to say? It was done right. The screenwriters
were faithful to the book as much as they could be--which keeps fans happy. The movie lacked a few certain plot points, but
nothing detrimental to the story. The cast is perhaps the most carefully and perfectly chosen ensemble cast I have ever seen
in a movie. Everyone was perfect for their respective roles.
As for the controversy. I'm a stalwart fan. I say, read
the books and watch the movie before you DARE pass judgment on Rowling and her wizard lad. Magic is necessary to the story,
but witchcraft is portrayed in a fantastical manner. I've heard most witches are rather offended by certain elements. Frankly,
the morals of the story far outweigh anything negative. A Christian would do well to follow some of the morals in here--friendship,
loyalty, forgiveness, bravery, selflessness. If one feels a conviction not to see or read Harry Potter, that is fine. Note,
however, he is in the same vein as the Brothers Grimm, C.S. Lewis, Tolkien, and most fairy tales. For my piece, I recommend
Harry Potter, if you wish to give it a go.
My score: 9. Reviewed By: Becky P.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Directed By: Chris Columbus PG,
2 hrs. 40 mins.
Being that I have not read any of the Potter books, and my good friend RC was paying, I went and saw Harry Potter and
the Sorcerers Stone. The movie briefly details the first 10 years of the young boy's life, which he spends as a normal non-magic
human raised by his aunt and uncle. It goes into great detail about his 11th year, which he spends at Hogwart's school of
wizardry and witchcraft. He is nearly instantly befriended by two other first year students Together, they cause enough trouble
and break enough rules to be expelled, and yet because Harry is so famous in the witch world, and because every thing works
out for the better, they dont get the boot.
I myself had a hard time buying the main premise behind his being famous.
He was the only person to ever survive the wrath of the evil wizard Valtimor. Valtimor killed both of Harry's parents, yet
could not destroy the infant Potter. Potter somehow has some mysterious wizardry gifts that no one can match, yet everyone
seems to be able to explain them to him.
Other than that, I found the movie to be rather entertaining and funny. This
however is in a way a problem. How you ask? Simply this, the magic performed in this movie is all the same sort of sorcery
that any God fearing Christian has been commanded to stay away from. This movie makes using magic look fun and inviting, which
I do believe can and will easily lead many children to investigate a life in the occult. It also seems to be a bit on the
instructional side, showing how and what incantation to use to perform many of the smaller feats of magic, like levitation
and unlocking of doors. The message of love makes your craft skills better, is a dangerous message to present to our youth.
As a discerning adult, I could not bring myself to allow anyone under the age of 16-18 into a movie like that, without parental
supervision, which would include a discussion after the movie, about the reasons why it is dangerous.
Rating: This
movie gets a 9 on the secular side, for being a wonderfully made movie filled with humor, a couple twists, and a pretty much
well laid plotline. On the Spiritual side, I must give this movie a rating of a 1, for being drivel that will simply rot the
minds of those to young to handle it.
Reviewed By: Jason Smith, Pacific Northwest correspondent 11/17/01
Rush Hour 2
Directed by: Brett Ratner PG-13, 1 hr. 45 min.
Having missed the first Rush Hour, I was a bit leery of rushing into the sequel. Only my amusement at previous Jackie
Chan movies brought me through the theatre doors. Having said that, I am pleased to report a positive review. It was original
and funny (not old jokes on replay or sequel "in" jokes). Even the plot was edible.
In the story, Lee and Carter start
out on a police investigation in Hong Kong that appears fairly simple. Refusing to stay that way, the story drags them back
to L.A. where a serious counterfeit king must be uncovered. Along with all that is the resolving of a father's death,
giving the plot more human interest and depth.
This one rates: 8 Reviewed by: Melinda S.
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within Directed by: Hironobu Sakaguchi
and Motonori Sakakibara
PG-13, 1 hr. 45 mins.
The year is 2065, and Earth is, for all intents and purposes, demolished by spirits and phantoms. Humans live in barriered
cities above the old cities, a bit like in 'Big O' (Cartoon Network, Toonami). Our main character, Dr Aki Ross, opens our
story, hurtling into Old NYC to find a lifeform which may contain the needed sixth spirit wave. For months she has dreamed
of a strange alien planet and its destruction. She knows the dreams are signals to the fate of her own planet and hold the
key to understanding the phantoms. She works for one Dr. Sid, an elderly genius who discovered that the attacking phantoms
contained the same sequence of spirit waves as humans. He believes in the spirit of the Earth, Gaia (as in Greek myth, yes),
and believes these spirit waves hold the key to defeating the phantoms destroying earth.
The altercations between
humans and alien phantoms aren't the only conflict here. One General Hein lost family to the phantoms, and he is obsessed
with their destruction. He is an advocate of the Zeus, a huge bio-ethereal laser that can destroy phantoms. Dr Sid and Aki
are dead set against this weapon, for they fear it would actually harm Gaia in the process of defeating the phantoms.
The
dialogue is fairly unoriginal and often falls flat when it attempts humour, mostly in the guise of technogeek/pilot Neil,
although he is truly a amiable sort. Most of the characters ARE actually stock characters, but--doggone it--they're LIKABLE.
Aki is your typical heroine, with her own secrets. Gray is your stalwart lover. Neil is the sarcastic, and slightly lonely,
techno-boy. Jane, another Deep Eyes member, is the tough, buff chick. Sgt. Ryan is portrayed as a muscular and honourable
second in command. The plot is clichd in an anime sort of way, but enjoyable. The end is truly non-western, bittersweet and
almost unhappy for individuals but hopeful for mankind, allowing characters to display their bravery, honour, and grace.
The
true prizes here are the cast and the animation. The cast is amazing. Ming-Na as Aki, Alec Baldwin as Gray, Ving Rhames are
Ryan, Peri Gilpin as Jane, Steve Buscemi as Neil, Donald Sutherland as Dr Sid, and the incredible James Woods as General Hein.
Jean Simmons from 'Guys and Dolls' and 'Spartacus' even pops up in a small role.
The animation...is about as perfect
as CGI can get right now. In some scenes, it truly looks real, from the landscapes to the mole on Aki's lip. Skin pigmentation
is done very intricately. Hands have veins, and eyes have wrinkles. Incredible. I was nearly drooling. The kissing scene isn't
bad either. So, yeah, check this puppy out.
My rating: On story--7.5. On animation--9.5. Reviewed by: Becky P.
The Princess Diaries Produced by: Whitney Houston, Debra Martin
Chase and Mario Iscovich
G, 1 hr. 50 min.
This is a darling movie! It's clean, good fun that makes it beyond the simplistic air of most G rated fare. It has a
star filled cast, including Julie Andrews, Anne Hathaway, Hector Elizondo, and Caroline Goodall. Hector is especially charming
and Julie Andrews plays a lovely grandmother/queen.
A girl in high school, Mia is the typical invisible teenager.
Suddenly, she finds herself bound to be the next queen of Genovia, a small European country. Between the media circus that
ensues, the princess lessons she takes with her grandmother, and the totally new life; Mia is not quite sure she wants to
take the position offered. What will her choice be?
If you miss this one, it would make a good family rental for future
months. I rate it: 8 Reviewed by: Melinda S.
A.I.: Artificial Intelligence Directed by: Steven Spielberg
PG-13, 2 hrs. 25 min.
WARNING: sad movie, bring a tissue.
A.I. is about a computer boy who wants to be real in order to gain acceptance.
Little of the plot can be given away without spoiling it. However, the boy goes through things a boy should never have to
go through to gain what should have come a lot sooner: dreams. If you are looking for fast movie this is not it. Over two
hours long, it drags on far longer than it needed to.
So why go see it? If you are a science fiction fan, or a fan
of Asimov's rules of robotics, or if you just like the idea of artificial intelligence--go see it. It has wonderful special
effects. (Could we get anything less with Steven Spielberg directing?) Haley Joel Osment does a marvellous job as the boy.
Robin Williams also makes a pleasant surprise appearance.
This one gets a: #7 Reviewed By: Melinda
America's Sweethearts
This is a movie full of surprises. Packed with stars like Julia Roberts, Billy Crystal, John Cusack, and Catherine Zeta Jones
it could hardly be less than a great movie. The story is of two sisters, two relationships, a fast talking publicist,
and a movie that will ruin them all. Or will it? Julia plays the likable sister, Zeta plays the witchy sister, Cusack plays
a jealous husband, and Crystal plays the publicist who must make them work together for the press release of a movie that
may or may not exist! If you miss it in the theatre, see it anyway. It would make a good date movie or a rental.
I rated it: #8 Reviewed by: Melinda
From August 2001

Evolution Directed by: Ivan Reitman
PG13, 1hr. 43mins.
Avid Duchovny fans, Ann and I found ourselves sitting a theatre eagerly waiting for the opening moments of Evolution.
Keep in mind that evolution (according to the all-knowing Webster) supposedly means developing/growing toward a more positive
state of existence. (It can also mean the emitting of large amounts of gas, which actually happened on a rather massive scale.)
We, however, walked out of the theatre afterwards with the distinct feeling that we had actually devolved.
Beware
Sci Fi fans, this is not just another movie about large bugs, as some of the previews had lead some to believe. We came to
the conclusion that it was actually a melding between M.I.B., Jurassic Park, and Planet of the Apes, with a little taste of
Dumb and Dumber thrown in for dressing. After overcoming our initial disappointment we sat back and laughingly enjoyed the
rest of the film (Well most of the rest of the movie. I personally could have done without seeing David's pasty white behind.)
Evolution is about two college professors, and a local pool maintenance guy, whose encounter with an asteroid teeming
with alien life leaves their own lives turned upside down. The life on the asteroid starts out as amoebas, then quickly evolves
into increasingly higher life forms. This process takes days, or hours, versus the millions of years that Evolutionists try
and claim WE took to evolve (Do you really want to think you descended from a primate???). In the end the day is saved by
these unlikely heroes, and their even more unlikely team using an even MORE unlikely substance. The ending made us wonder
if the real point of the movie involved the eradication of interstellar dandruff.
Our final verdict? Rent it later,
save your money for Shrek. This rates a #5 on the scale. Reviewed by: Jek and Ann
From July 2001

Save the Last Dance Directed by: Thomas Carter
I went into this movie not knowing what to expect. It's a story about a girl who looses her mother, her dance, and her
life all in one go. She must make her way in a new hip-hop world while finding her dance and herself. Entwined with all that
is a Romeo and Juliet story with a...no, I won't tell the ending.
This is one of those movies that you watch, waiting
for the end, but not in a bad way. One asks, will it be a typical Romeo tragedy? Or will it have a happy ending? I won't tell
what happened, but I will say that I liked it. Also, her audition dance at the end is excellent! It's almost worth renting
the movie just for that! The only thing is, if you don't like hip-hop you may want to skip this one. Except for her last audition
song, you can not get away from it. Hint: Also, if you can, rent it on DVD and view the deleted scenes!
I rated
it: #8 Reviewed by: Melinda
|